Personal Sovereignty says something simple: no one can decide about your life instead of you. Magi promised a return plan from debt. "We're the only party that indicated a debt return plan," he says. But as we wrote in the book, public debt is an invention that aims to keep the subjects under pressure. Magi, who is a real genius, thinks of solving the problems of the Italians by making him pay an invented debt. He promised immediate resonances for families and businesses. The more Europe took 2.84%. He doesn't rule. He can't do anything. He promised "young people in the centre", "long-term policy for the new generations". If anyone wants to explain the meaning of this sentence, we'll have a courtesy. Every betrayal promise is a decision made for you. Every time Magi says "I will solve the debt problem" and does not solve it — because it cannot — it is still speaking on your behalf. And you can't do anything. You can't revoke it. You can't force him to keep the word. But he looks the same. And you vote the same. In our system, you are the source of power. In his, you're a party voter who can't do anything, but who still claims to speak for you. Abyssal difference.

The same Dignity says: everyone is born equal, with the same material rights. Period. Magi militated among the radicals of Marco Pannella. He was Secretary of Italian Radicali from 2015 to 2018. He founded More Europe. He has been MP since 2018, re-elected in 2022. He has been secretary of the party since 2023. He is a group leader in the Mixed House and a member of the I Commission (Constitutional affairs). What about your priorities? Legal cannabis, Bossi-Fini reform. These are "the rights Magi holds more." The rampant misery does not touch it. Evidently for Magi all Italians live as he lives. In the meantime: 48.2% of women employed have an involuntary part-time (ISTAT) The youth employment rate (15-34 years) is at 43.7% (against 50.2% EU) The gender pay gap is 5.4% (43% on pensions) The unemployment rate in the South is 13.8% (against 5.9% in the North) 9.1% of households are in energy poverty (14.6% in the Islands) His "equal dignity" is a two-speed dignity: one for those who care about cannabis, one for those who do not arrive at the end of the month. In our system, no one is born with privileges. Everyone is born sovereigns. And the first thing a sovereign receives is a home, an income, health, knowledge. Not a cannabis law.

The Sovereign Consensus says: no one can be minority. If a decision doesn't suit everyone, we keep discussing. Magi has been secretary of More Europe since 2023. But the party is crossed by strong internal tensions. In 2026, the current headed by Benedetto Della Vedova accused Magi of statutory violations and poor financial transparency. He ended up in court, with a lot of pro Veritate opinions of constitutionalists. In May 2026, the budget of More Europe was rejected by the assembly, putting at risk 2 per thousand. The Magi secretary went under both the political line and the accounts, and an open letter asked for resignation. Internal sources have reported that the party is likely to be canceled if it does not regularize its position, with the possible transmission of acts to the Guarantee Commission. This is not a community of rulers. It's a war between factions. Magi against Della Vedova. The majority against the minority. The secretary against the assembly. Nobody listens to anyone. No one seeks consent. Everyone tries to win. In our system, even one citizen who says "no" blocks everything. Because between rulers you do not win and you do not lose: you decide together. Magi won. The widow lost. The party is in court. We want everyone to win.

The Immune System serves to prevent a man from taking power. Immediate revocation, draw, incompatibility, short and non-renewable mandates. Automatic mechanisms, not good intentions. Magi is the opposite. More Europe has a section "Transparency" on its website where it publishes the contributions received. But the management of accounts is disputed. The budget has been rejected. The party risks the cancellation. The declared transparency does not correspond to real transparency. What about funding? George Soros paid 312,000 euros per head to six members of More Europe: Magi, Della Vedova, Giordano Masini, Simona Viola, Carla Taibi (260.000 euros) and Anna Maria Corazza Bildt (100.000 euros). The total amount exceeds 1.6 million euros. Joint statements deposited at the Chamber, therefore regular. But the point is not formal regularity. The point is who pays and why. Michels, a hundred years ago, had foreseen all this: the ferreous law of oligarchy. Every organization inevitably produces an elite that dominates it. The more Europe is no exception. Magi is no exception. It is the living confirmation of the law. And the fact that the party is in court for the management of accounts is proof that the system is designed to allow it.

The Sovereign Coin says: money is a public service, not a commodity. The Community issue it without debt. Private banks do not exist. Magi never talks about this. He doesn't say where the money comes from for his policies. He doesn't say who finances his ascent. He doesn't say if he wants to break down the power of the banks or leave it intact. His financiers, however, speak for him: George Soros paid over 1.6 million euros to six members of More Europe, of which 312,000 euros to Magi himself. More Europe presents itself as an "anti-subranist" and "European" party. He receives money from an international financier. And it supports the policies that the financier supports. Inconvenient question: who pays his campaign? Who benefits from his policies? As long as he doesn't say, his "subrase" is only rhetoric. In our system, the money is transparent and plotted. In its, it remains in the shadow — even when it is declared, because no one explains why.

Self-sufficiency says: a sovereign people produces what consumes and consumes what they produce. Energy, food, technology, defense. Material addiction, not flags. Magi says he wants a strong Europe. More Europe is opposed to the confederal idea of Meloni. In fact, the European Union is self-sustaining, and now has not much to live. What about the guns? More Europe and Magi have an explicitly Atlantean and Europeanist position. They organized flash mob in support of Zelensky and asked the PD to "demonstrate its closeness not only with the votes in favor of sending weapons, but also with every other mode at its disposal". Magi has also stated that if the Count line prevails in the wide field (no weapons and rearmament), More Europe would not be there. This is not sovereignty. It is subordinate to the interests of NATO and the European Union. Italy does not produce weapons to defend itself. He produces them to send them to whom he uses them to make war. The war in Ukraine is not our war. But our weapons do. Vannacci says: "Let's change master." Meloni says: "We stay with the current master." Crosetto says: "We sell weapons to all masters." Salvini says: "Navy boy!" — but he never did. Schlein says: "Defensive weapons" — but does not say "no" to weapons. Magi says: "Weapons to Zelensky, otherwise we're not in the wide field." None of them say: "We have no masters." We do.

The Time of Life says: the only criterion that counts is the quality of time you spend on this earth. Not GDP, not productivity, not war. Magi promised a return plan from debt. Debt is an invention to keep the subjects under pressure. He promised resonances for families and businesses. He can't do it. He promised "young people in the middle." Nobody understands what that means. He promised civil rights (cannabis, Bossi-Fini). The PD manages health in Emilia Romagna. In the last 2 legislature, the quality of public service has declined dramatically. Today if you have a problem, or you have the money to go to a private, or you die. What about the misery? Don't touch it. Magi lives in a world where the problems of Italians are cannabis and Bossi-Fini. But cannabis does not solve poverty. Bossi-Fini does not solve unemployment. Reentry from debt does not solve the lack of houses. This is his legacy: a party at 2.84% which does not rule, which can do nothing, which is likely to be erased, and which continues to talk about niche rights while the misery spreads. The time of Italian life was stolen twice: first to pay taxes, then to pay the bill of promises never kept. In our system, free time is the supreme criterion. Every hour spent working to pay an invented debt is an hour of stolen life.

If Moscow, Pareto and Michels wanted an empirical case for their theories, they could not find him better than Magi. Moscow said that in every society there is a political class that governs the disorganized majority. Magi is a member of this class: radical with Pannella, secretary of Radicali Italiani, founder of More Europe, deputy since 2018, secretary since 2023. He spent his entire adult life in politics or in his surroundings. He is not a man of the people. He is a politician, son of a system he learned to use to conquer and maintain power — even when power is microscopic, like 2.84% More Europe. Pareto said that the story is a cemetery of aristocracies and that the elite circulate. Magi is the perfect example: the radical elite that, after the season of Pannella, has been recycled into European elite. His ascent is not a revolution. It's elite circulation. Power changes shape, but remains in the same hands. Michels said democracy inevitably produces oligarchy. Magi is the confirmation: a party that presents itself as "transparent" and "democratic", but that ends in court for the management of accounts, which rejects the budget, which risks the cancellation. His strength does not come from the people. It comes from its network of reports and funding (Soros: 1.6 million). It is the very definition of oligarchy: the government of few, for few, without the consent of the most. The fundamental difference: we want to disconnect the ferreous law of oligarchy. Magi embodies it. And the fact that its party risks deletion for the management of accounts is proof that the system is designed to allow it.

If you have voted for More Europe, know that you have made an abdication of sovereignty. You delivered your power to a party that took 2.84%. A party that doesn't rule. A party that can't do anything he promised. A party that is in court for the management of accounts. A party that risks deletion. Article 67: "Every member of Parliament represents the Nation and exercises its functions without a mandate. "
→ Translated: electoral promises are ragged paper. He can betray you, legally. Article 68: Parliamentary immunity.
→ Translated: If you commit crimes, you need permission from your colleagues to process it. Together, they form the shield of Casta. The first one lets you betray. The second protects you while you do it. Magi betrayed the debt return plan. He betrayed strong Europe. He betrayed civil rights. He betrayed the resonances for families and businesses. He betrayed the young people in the middle. Five promises cheated on five. And the Constitution protects him. In Community of Sovereigns, all this does not exist. No immunity. No warrant without constraint. Who's wrong pays. Those who betray laugh. And who presents himself with a program that will not keep is not even allowed to do so. Because there are no elections. There are no campaigns. There are no promises. Only decisions taken together, as a peer, without masters.

Magi is not a political opponent like others. It is the anti-Community of Sovereigns in its most marginal and ambiguous form. Every principle is the denial of our principle: He wants the hierarchy. We equality. He wants the majority crushing. We are unanimity. He wants the boss. We the mechanisms. He wants propaganda. We are the truth. He wants the past. We're the future. She promised her debt return plan. He didn't. He promised strong Europe. The EU is self-sustaining. He promised civil rights (cannabis, Bossi-Fini). The misery spreads and he doesn't see it. He promised resonance. He doesn't rule. He promised the young people in the middle. Nobody understands what that means. What about your lenders? George Soros: over 1.6 million euros to six members of More Europe. The party presents itself as an "anti-subranist" and receives money from an international financier who supports the same policies worldwide. Community of Sovereigns is the only possible answer. Not because it's perfect, but because it's the only one that doesn't reproduce the twists of the past. Magi is the past that returns. We are the future that has yet to be born. The choice is clear. And it doesn't admit neutrality.

More Europe has a section "Transparency" on its website where it publishes the contributions received. But declared transparency does not correspond to real transparency. The internal tensions: In 2026, the current headed by Benedetto Della Vedova accused Magi of statutory violations and poor financial transparency. He ended up in court, with a lot of pro Veritate opinions of constitutionalists. The budget rejected: In May 2026, the budget of More Europe was rejected by the assembly, putting at risk 2 per thousand. The Magi secretary went under both the political line and the accounts, and an open letter asked for resignation. The risk of cancellation: Internal sources have reported that the party is likely to be canceled if it does not regularize its position, with the possible transmission of acts to the Commission of guarantee of statutes and for the transparency and control of the accounts of political parties. Financing: George Soros paid 312,000 euros per head to six members of More Europe: Magi, Della Vedova, Giordano Masini, Simona Viola, Carla Taibi (260.000 euros) and Anna Maria Corazza Bildt (100.000 euros). The total amount exceeds 1.6 million euros. The result: A party that presents itself as "transparent" and "democratic", but ends in court for the management of accounts, which rejects the budget, which risks the cancellation. A party that takes 2.84% and does not rule, but who still claims to speak for you. A party that receives over 1.6 million from George Soros and presents itself as an "anti-subranist". In Community of Sovereigns, this would not be possible. No party. No private funding. No opaque management of accounts. No cancellation. Only sovereign citizens who decide together, as a peer, without masters. And no one can buy their voice.